Talk to an Expert →
Blog · October 25, 2021

A New Potentially Significant EAR Rule Has Been Proposed by BIS

The Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) today issued an interim rule on revised export controls pertaining to certain cybersecurity items and implementation of those controls. BIS requested comments addressing the impact of these controls on industry and the cybersecurity community. Those comments are to be received by December 6, 2021, and can be submitted through the Federal Rulemaking Portal. The new rule is to become effective on Monday, January 19, 2022*.

The rule will establish a new export control over certain items along with a new exception for Authorized Cybersecurity Exports (ACE). The ACE allows exports of the controlled items except in circumstances described in the rule.

Everything covered by this new interim rule, and the final rule in January, require a conscientious review of the proposed controls. It began with earlier attempts to define and control “intrusion software”, the technology of “development”, “production” or “use”, and “command and control” software. It led to a May 20, 2015, interim rule that was not finalized in favor of further negotiations of controls and outreach to industry. This interim rule is the result of further negotiation and is described by BIS as “limited scope” and, it believes, minimal impact. Given the nature of the changes, it’s important to look over the changes and submit comments to ensure that belief applies to your organization.

*Of course, these changes do not affect items subject to the ITAR. As the BIS interim rule notes, “[i]tems and services described on the U.S. Munitions List (USML) at ITAR § 121.1, including military training, technical data directly related to a defense article, and certain hardware and software specially designed for intelligence purposes, remain subject to the ITAR.”

See the enclave in action.

The Compliant Computing Enclave keeps CUI inside one boundary, with your endpoints out of scope and the evidence trail already built.

Talk to an Expert →
Keep reading

More from the blog

October 20, 2026

Week 12: Conclusion

Why GCC High compliance evidence matters Over the past eleven weeks, this series has followed the...

Read it →

October 13, 2026

Week 11: Questions Agencies and Contractors Should Ask Now

Why GCC High due diligence matters Last week, we explained why purpose-built compliant enclaves can offer...

Read it →

October 7, 2026

Week 10: Why Purpose-Built Enclaves Matter

Why a purpose-built compliance enclave matters Last week, we discussed cost, migration burden, and functionality gaps....

Read it →